<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPCC claims three page paper is a &#8217;study&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/</link>
	<description>Remembering what they will want us to forget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marion Morrison</title>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatequotes.com/?p=597#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Sure, now I&#039;m really convinced, Chris.  You make a lot of sense there.  Just keep telling yourself that I&#039;m the one with my eyes closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, now I&#8217;m really convinced, Chris.  You make a lot of sense there.  Just keep telling yourself that I&#8217;m the one with my eyes closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatequotes.com/?p=597#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatequotes.com/?p=597#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Marion Morrison - still another GW believer clinging on by the fingernails to a totally discredited religion. You will fall eyes-closed to the truth, screaming into the abyss with all the other uninformed gullible losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marion Morrison &#8211; still another GW believer clinging on by the fingernails to a totally discredited religion. You will fall eyes-closed to the truth, screaming into the abyss with all the other uninformed gullible losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Morrison</title>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatequotes.com/?p=597#comment-116</guid>
		<description>So...you&#039;ve found a single sentence that mentions a &quot;concepts considered&quot; which comes from a 3 page source and simply refers to the possibility of future aircraft development, nothing more - you think this proves...what exactly?  
How many other sources does the IPCC use in the report you&#039;ve excerpted above?
As with so much skeptic commentary, this is purely a desperate attempt to discover anything, absolutely anything, that can be rationalized as &#039;proof&#039; of a vaguely defined paranoia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;you&#8217;ve found a single sentence that mentions a &#8220;concepts considered&#8221; which comes from a 3 page source and simply refers to the possibility of future aircraft development, nothing more &#8211; you think this proves&#8230;what exactly?<br />
How many other sources does the IPCC use in the report you&#8217;ve excerpted above?<br />
As with so much skeptic commentary, this is purely a desperate attempt to discover anything, absolutely anything, that can be rationalized as &#8216;proof&#8217; of a vaguely defined paranoia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence is Scuttled</title>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/02/08/ipcc-claims-three-page-paper-is-a-study/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence is Scuttled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatequotes.com/?p=597#comment-114</guid>
		<description>more pee revue
that is how you know you are dealing with experts
they are only asking us to trust them
the little green men come to serve us - they say so.
don&#039;t run - they are our friends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more pee revue<br />
that is how you know you are dealing with experts<br />
they are only asking us to trust them<br />
the little green men come to serve us &#8211; they say so.<br />
don&#8217;t run &#8211; they are our friends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
