<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>ClimateQuotes.com</title>
	<link>http://climatequotes.com</link>
	<description>Remembering what they will want us to forget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>New TEEB for Business report contains multiple errors</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I found several errors in the first chapter of the TEEB's interim report, which led to their issuing of a Corrigendum correcting their mistakes, and others. On July 13'th, they issued a new report: the TEEB for Business report. In the first few days after the report was issued, I looked at the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/07/28/new-teeb-for-business-report-contains-multiple-errors/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>IPBES about governance, not science</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent news that the UN was creating an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) created a bit of a stir. It was obviously (and openly) modeled on the IPCC, an organization which has its share of problems. This new 'IPCC for biodiversity' panel has already been viewed with serious skepticism, especially [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/07/16/ipbes-about-governance-not-science/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>TEEB responds, issues corrections to report</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I was surprised to see this comment on one of my TEEB articles recently:
From TEEB Scientific Coordination
Dear Sam, Thank you for your feedback on Chapter 1 references in TEEB’s “Interim Report” of May, 2008. It is heartening to note your in-depth study of this report. You raised some valid points, which have now been addressed [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/07/08/teeb-responds-issues-corrections-to-report/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>July Fourth</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change is one of many issues debated in America today, and it often can be very divisive. However, I think today all of us Americans can agree on one thing: I'm glad I'm not a Brit.
No offense to Brits, but I'm glad I'm American, and today is the day to celebrate that. Happy Independence [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/07/04/july-fourth/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Newsweek climategate article</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A college friend of mine who knows I write about climate change brought this Newsweek article to my attention today:
Newspapers Retract 'Climategate' Claims, but Damage Still Done
He wanted my opinion on it. I wrote a quick review of the article, and I'm reposting it (slightly modified) below.

Joe, this article is written by a women who [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/06/25/newsweek-climategate-article/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>TEEB pushes fear and new taxes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The past two days I've looked at the UN's interim TEEB report and found several errors in the first chapter. I was going to write a post about how this pseudo-science spreads, but after looking at several TEEB documents I decided to write on a new topic. 
The TEEB isn't a scientific body, it exists [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/06/13/teeb-pushes-fear-and-new-taxes/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>TEEB report has multiple errors in first chapter alone, Part #2</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I posted about how the UN TEEB report had an error in the very first chapter relating to forest cover. There are two more errors I'll cover now, relating to two more items on this scary list:
However, the levels of many of the benefits we derive from
the environment have plunged over the past 50 [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/06/11/teeb-report-has-multiple-errors-in-first-chapter-alone-part-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>TEEB report has multiple errors in first chapter alone, Part #1</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been quiet here for over a month. This has been a busy time for me, I am now a college graduate (and looking for a job, know of any?). I intend to continue posting however, and when I saw a headline article on climate depot a while ago I dug a little deeper into [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/06/10/teeb-report-has-multiple-errors-in-first-chapter-alone-part-1/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Yet another lead author falsely cited; tourism mistake in the AR4</title>
		<description><![CDATA[You might recall an earlier false claim in the AR4 about tourism, about Canada and wildfires. There is another mistake in the AR4 regarding tourism, this time it is in WGII, Chapter 9.4.7 Tourism. The following claim appears:
Although scientific evidence is still lacking, it is probable that flood risks and water-pollution-related diseases in low-lying regions [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/04/28/yet-another-lead-author-falsely-cited-tourism-mistake-in-the-ar4/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>AR4 makes false claim about Bangladesh mangroves</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking through the AR4 recently in order to look at the recent Bangladeshi scientist's claim that the AR4 exaggerated how much sea level rise would affect their country. That may be another post, because I found another false claim related to Bangladesh.
In WGII, Chapter 10.2.4.3 Oceans and coastal zones, the following claim appears [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://climatequotes.com/2010/04/25/ar4-makes-false-claim-about-bangladesh-mangroves/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
